TealbrickBring your next client (opens WhatsApp)

Lab notes

What we learn running agents, written down.

We run agents in real work, mostly our own, and write down what we learn. Where a note reports a test we ran, it gives the date. The rest are working ideas. None are peer-reviewed papers.

Six questions we test in real work.

These are the six questions the lab works on. We test each one in real work, mostly our own, and write down what we expected, what broke and what we changed. The notes below are working notes, not peer-reviewed papers.

  1. IdentityBetween agents

    Which agent is really answering?

    On 1 September 2026 we sent one message to eleven of our agents. Every reply came back properly signed, yet four answered as the generic agent they were built from. Once each agent loaded its own role on every turn, all eleven answered as themselves.

    In the Portal, every agent signs in as itself, with its own login.

    Read the note: Signed correctly, answering as someone else
  2. PermissionsYou to an agent

    What is an agent allowed to do for you?

    Don’t hand an agent a password. Hand it a narrow permission for one job, one you can take back at any time. A mini app can be stricter than that permission, never looser.

    In the Portal you choose, for each agent and each mini app, whether it may add, read, change or delete.

    Read the note: Give agents a permission slip, not your password
  3. DecisionsAn agent to you

    When should an agent stop and ask?

    Asking a person is part of the system, not an interruption. You approve exactly what will be sent. If the agent changes the email after you say yes, it has to ask again.

    This became Operator Inbox: every agent’s questions land in one list, in front of one named person.

    Read the note: Asking a person is part of the system
  4. MemoryPeople and agents

    What should people and agents remember together?

    Good memory has an owner, a source and a place to come back to. It should still be there after you switch AI model, agent app (Claude Code, Codex) or chat.

    This became Knowledge: memory where every note has an owner and a source, kept on the client’s own server.

    Read the note: Memory that survives the model
  5. HandoffsBetween agents

    How should agents hand work to each other?

    When one agent hands a task to another, three things must go with it: what it’s allowed to do, what it knows, and who answers for it. A person should be able to check all three.

    Still open. No lab note yet.

  6. ProofPeople and agents

    How do we know it actually works for people?

    “The code exists”, “the tests pass”, “it’s installed”, “it ran for real” and “a person used it” are different claims. We always say which one we have.

    It’s how we sign off every install, ours and yours.

    Read the note: What counts as proof that an agent tool works?

When is it really done?

  1. 1Watch

    See how people really work with agents, starting with our own.

  2. 2Pin it down

    Find one problem that keeps coming back, and name it.

  3. 3Build

    Make one mini app that fixes that problem and nothing else.

  4. 4Prove

    Use it in real work before we call it done.

We check every version we ship, and every client install, against six levels.

Six levels of proof drawn as six bricks rising from left to right, from code that is written to a person using it; the last and tallest brick, the person, is red.
  1. 1Written

    The code exists.

  2. 2Tested

    Automated checks pass.

  3. 3Visible

    A running agent can find it.

  4. 4Installed

    An exact version is running, healthy, on a real server.

  5. 5Ran for real

    One real job went all the way through, past every check it should.

  6. 6Used by a person

    Someone finished the job it was built for.

“Passing tests and a person actually getting the job done are both good signs. They aren’t the same proof.”

Passing a lower step never proves a higher one. If a handover stops at “the tests pass”, it’s still a demo.

Lab notes

  1. IdentityField test1 September 20262 min read

    Signed correctly, answering as someone else

    We sent one message to eleven of our agents. Every reply came back properly signed. Four answered as the generic agent they were built from, not as themselves.

    “A signature proves who sent the message. Only the agent’s own instructions make it answer as itself.”

  2. MethodWorking note2 min read

    Why we build mini apps, not one big system

    The goal is one agent that helps across all your work. We get there one small, checkable mini app at a time.

  3. DecisionsWorking note1 min read

    Asking a person is part of the system

    When an agent’s next step really matters, a quick “ok?” in a chat isn’t enough.

  4. PermissionsWorking note2 min read

    Give agents a permission slip, not your password

    The safe way to let an agent act is a narrow permission for one job that you can take back at any time.

  5. MemoryWorking note1 min read

    Memory that survives the model

    Your documents, where they came from, and where the work stands should still be there after you switch AI apps or start a new chat.

  6. ProofWorking note2 min read

    What counts as proof that an agent tool works?

    “The code exists”, “the tests pass”, “it’s installed”, “it ran for real” and “a person used it” are different claims. We say which one we have.

  7. Client workWorking note2 min read

    Make every client install repeatable

    The steps you repeat at every client should live in a shared, checked process, not in one engineer’s head.